[georss] Geolocation by reference
Carl Reed OGC Account
creed at opengeospatial.org
Fri Nov 16 11:35:47 EST 2007
Interesting discussion. There may be some useful (old) OGC discussion papers on the topic of parsing text for one or more geospatial references, using a gazetteer to get the geometries associated with those geo-references, and then linking the geometry to the textual reference. There was a really excellent OGC Test Bed called Geospatial Fusion Services that was completed back in 2001. There are numerous discussion papers that are still on the OGC Retired Paper Archive (http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/retired). Check out GeoParser and Location Organizer Folder (LOF). There may be some interesting ideas and approaches of use.
Regards
Carl
----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew Turner
To: Sean Gillies
Cc: georss at lists.eogeo.org
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: [georss] Geolocation by reference
On Nov 15, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Sean Gillies wrote:
How would this work with multiple geometries for a single entry? Somehow
referring to an element id within the content would be nice.
Multiple geometries:
<georss:where
scheme="http://example.com/vocabularies/x"
term="is-bounded-by">...</georss:where>
<georss:where
scheme="http://example.com/vocabularies/x"
term="is-centered-on">...</georss:where>
I feel the story of different geometries related to different sections
of the content is beyond the scope of Atom. An Atom entry representing a
bibliographic record about "Voyage Autour Du Monde" or containing a blog
post about a backcountry ski trip would be well served by a single line
or multipoint geometry in a georss:where element.
This doesn't address that you speak of 5 locations in your single entry on your Voyage. Brandon's MetaCarta GeoRSS parser is a particularly exemplary case of needing a way to reference items within the content. His demo geoparser includes about 15 locations for every news item, and it's not clear what bits refer to what part of the article.
with the no attribute case defaulting to "is-located-at" works.
We're *way* behind on moving forward with some of the outstanding
'feature requests' that we were thinking about for GeoRSS v1.2 (I
believe 1.1 was a 'bug fix'?). What say we put together this SRC
proposal, Toponym, Multiple Geometry and others as potential specs and
do an email discussion vote for a 1.2 update?
Working my proposal into GeoRSS in some form would be great. I'm also
hoping to find some folks who would like to help me write a "best
geospatial practices for Atom" document.
Well, it would help if you put up a page on the GeoRSS.org CMS kind of
summarizing the proposal. A BP for GeoAtom would be great!
I want to field test this a bit to make sure that it's not just geo
wankery. How about another attempt at Geo-Atom interop?
Sounds good, but for me it would probably have to wait until after the New Year.
Sean
_______________________________________________
georss mailing list
georss at lists.eogeo.org
http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss
--
Andrew Turner
ajturner at highearthorbit.com 42.2774N x 83.7611W
http://highearthorbit.com Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
georss mailing list
georss at lists.eogeo.org
http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.eogeo.org/pipermail/georss/attachments/20071116/2b9453b0/attachment.html
More information about the georss
mailing list