[georss] Quick Fire Summary

[Joshua Lieberman]

Chris,

I guess we forgot to tell you, but yes, we thought we'd just use your  
opinions to make rules. Definitely better than flipping a coin.

--Josh

On May 1, 2007, at 7:14 AM, Christopher Schmidt wrote:

> On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 07:04:23AM -0400, Knoth, Brian D. wrote:
>> Andrew, Josh:
>>
>> Ok, thanks for clarifying that.
>>
>> Just one more question - when we last put something up for vote  
>> that I
>> had recommended, we got a total of about 7 votes (majority  
>> favorable or
>> neutral), but none-the-less, apparently not enough to spur any
>> decision. Do you have a minimum criteria of voting results that you
>> expect in order to seriously take action on those results? To be
>> honest, I've see about 10-15 distinct people who post to this  
>> list, so
>> would that amount of votes carry any weight?
>
> I expect that a web-based poll would be subject to a larger
> participating audience. Sending an email takes time, but a yes/no poll
> is simple. I'd say that we're likely to see a case where although only
> 15 people participate in the list, we'd see a larger participation  
> in a
> web-based vote.
>
> But that's just my guess, and my opinion doesn't make rules here :)
>
> Regards,
> -- 
> Christopher Schmidt
> Web Developer
> _______________________________________________
> georss mailing list
> georss at lists.eogeo.org
> http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss
_______________________________________________
georss mailing list
georss at lists.eogeo.org
http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss