[georss] using categories for disambiguation
Pat Cappelaere
pat at cappelaere.com
Thu Mar 8 16:29:44 EST 2007
Andrew,
If you go to our SWE data node: http://eo1.geobliki.com/xml/atom10/feed.xml
You will find that we have extended the Atom feed with geonames related
information for the specific image.
<entry>
...
<georss:where>
<gml:Point>
<gml:pos>-15.59 -175.66</gml:pos>
</gml:Point>
</georss:where>
<geonames:geonames>
<geonames:countryCode>TO</geonames:countryCode>
<geonames:countryName>Tonga</geonames:countryName>
<geonames:adminCode>03</geonames:adminCode>
<geonames:adminName>Vavau</geonames:adminName>
<geonames:zoneNumber>728</geonames:zoneNumber>
<geonames:zoneName>Ross Sea</geonames:zoneName>
<geonames:regionNumber>50</geonames:regionNumber>
<geonames:regionName>Antarctica</geonames:regionName>
<geonames:nearBy>Esia, Mata`aho, Sapa`ata, Fata`ulua, Mu`a, Petani,
Tongamama`o</geonames:nearBy>
</geonames:geonames>
</entry>
Pat.
> From: Andrew Turner <ajturner at highearthorbit.com>
> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:23:19 -0500
> To: Sean Gillies <sgillies at frii.com>
> Cc: <georss at lists.eogeo.org>
> Subject: Re: [georss] using categories for disambiguation
>
> On 3/8/07, Sean Gillies <sgillies at frii.com> wrote:
>> Or, for Atom users:
>>
>> <category term="mountain" scheme="http://georss.org/physiography"/>
>>
>> Hosting a few key schemes might be a worthwhile side-project for georss.org.
>>
>
> Geonames has a pretty good list of Feature codes:
> http://www.geonames.org/export/codes.html
>
>
>> Pat Cappelaere wrote:
>>> Andrew,
>>>
>>> I do not see anything wrong to say:
>>> <category>mountain</category>
>>> No even a need for geo:type=
>>> Pat.
>>>
>>>> From: Andrew Turner <ajturner at highearthorbit.com>
>>>> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 15:52:03 -0500
>>>> To: "Gregor J. Rothfuss" <gregor at apache.org>
>>>> Cc: Pat Cappelaere <pat at cappelaere.com>, <georss at lists.eogeo.org>, Raj
>>>> Singh
>>>> <raj at rajsingh.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [georss] using categories for disambiguation
>>>>
>>>> On 3/8/07, Gregor J. Rothfuss <gregor at apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> A category is a category is a category!
>>>>>> Having multiple categories tags make the decoding harder from an
>>>>>> interoperability standpoint. Everybody will be doing it differently.
>>>>>> You can have more than one category tag anyway!
>>>>>>
>>>> I don't think of the location type or relationship as a "category",
>>>> they are actual geographic meaning an relate the location
>>>> name/geometry to the RSS item. And because they have different meaning
>>>> (not just another category) you would end up putting in
>>>> <category>geo:type=mountain</category> or something anyways.
>>>>
>>>>> i suspect those two snuck in because they have a meaning in GIS. they
>>>>> sure don't in the larger RSS world.
>>>>>
>>>>> the 'just in case' school of standards leads to 600 page monsters that
>>>>> no one reads unless forced to.
>>>>>
>>>> Well, as one who has already admitted to not sitting down in a comfy
>>>> chair to read 600 page specs, I agree with simple & not "just in
>>>> case". But you're advocating changing the standard just because it
>>>> hasn't been widely used yet.
>>>>
>>>> It doesn't really matter to me *how* we relate geometry to the story,
>>>> I just want to be able to publish & consume location information and
>>>> know how that relates to the RSS item. If that's machine tags in the
>>>> category I guess that works, but there is a solution already somewhat
>>>> in place in {relationship,featuretype}tag so I think it would just be
>>>> better to promote using it.
>>>>
>>>> Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> georss mailing list
>>> georss at lists.eogeo.org
>>> http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> georss mailing list
>> georss at lists.eogeo.org
>> http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss
>>
>
>
> --
> Andrew Turner
> ajturner at highearthorbit.com 42.4266N x 83.4931W
> http://highearthorbit.com Northville, Michigan, USA
> _______________________________________________
> georss mailing list
> georss at lists.eogeo.org
> http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss
More information about the georss
mailing list