[georss] "When" information in georss

Andrew Turner ajturner at highearthorbit.com
Mon Aug 6 16:33:26 EDT 2007


On 8/6/07, Carl Reed OGC Account <creed at opengeospatial.org> wrote:
> Why not GML? There is a rapidly growing international movement in various
> scientific and research communities (such as Oceans monitoring and
> environmental monitoring) to enable and make web accessible (via standard
> interfaces) numerous sensor networks using the new OGC Sensor Observation
> Service (SOS) and/or WFS. Both return GML responses.

The primary reason was approachability and understandability by a
broad range of developers. i.e. someone creating a feed about concert
events.

Rons post does a good succint job of a simple example:

http://geoweb.blog.com/494471/
<gml:TimePeriod>
    <gml:begin>2003-02-13T12:28-08:00</gml:begin>
    <gml:end>2003-02-13T12:30-08:00</gml:end>
<gml:TimePeriod>

Also worth pointing out is the the GML TimePeriod uses ISO8601, and
Atom uses RFC3339 - which is a subset of ISO8601. so that jives nicely
with Atom


> Would be nice to be consistent.
>
> Just wondering.
>
> Carl
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Turner" <ajturner at highearthorbit.com>
> To: "Sean Gillies" <sgillies at frii.com>
> Cc: <georss at lists.eogeo.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 4:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [georss] "When" information in georss
>
>
> > b/c the current Time specification doesn't actually specify including
> > the time element in the response. This is similar to the Geo that uses
> > GeoRSS, and not OpenSearch-Geo, to specify the geographic search
> > parameters.
> >
> > I was hoping for a more generic definition of time (not even
> > necessarily bound to geo* - so not GML), but RSS or Atom don't support
> > that it appears (which is actually kind of surprising?
> >
> > On 8/1/07, Sean Gillies <sgillies at frii.com> wrote:
> >> Andrew Turner wrote:
> >> > On 7/29/07, Sean Gillies <sgillies at frii.com> wrote:
> >> >> The time period that the feed is valid for for ... that would be
> >> >> published/updated up until *now* right? It seems that the best way to
> >> >> indicate a future limit would be for the feed's origin server to set
> >> >> an
> >> >> "Expires" HTTP header. That would be going with the grain of the Web.
> >> >
> >> > I may have requested a feed for another, arbitrary time period, say
> >> > 4-20-2007 > 5-15-2007
> >> >
> >> > And relying on just the HTTP headers means that I then lose that
> >> > information if I store the file. So like GeoRSS feeds can have a
> >> > geometry that applies to the entire feed, it would be nice to use the
> >> > timespan to define a timespan for the entire feed. This is especially
> >> > important if I request a feed for that month, even if there are only
> >> > items for a week in the middle. The feed still is of the entire month.
> >> >
> >> > Brian - can you put that example as a page on the GeoRSS CMS?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Andrew
> >> >
> >>
> >> Andrew,
> >>
> >> Assuming you're using OpenSearch to request a feed using a temporal
> >> query, could you not rely on the os:Query element that you would include
> >> in the response?
> >>
> >> Sean
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> georss mailing list
> >> georss at lists.eogeo.org
> >> http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Turner
> > ajturner at highearthorbit.com      42.2774N x 83.7611W
> > http://highearthorbit.com              Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
> > Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography
> > _______________________________________________
> > georss mailing list
> > georss at lists.eogeo.org
> > http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss
>
>


-- 
Andrew Turner
ajturner at highearthorbit.com      42.2774N x 83.7611W
http://highearthorbit.com              Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography


More information about the georss mailing list