[georss] GeoRSS meeting review

[Carl Reed OGC Account]

Dan -

Just to follow on from the info Josh provided, there are an excellent set of 
resources related to ISO and OGC standards maintained on the SEEGRID website 
in Australia. Overviews of a variety of ISO 19xxx standards can be found at 
https://www.seegrid.csiro.au/twiki/bin/view/AppSchemas/IsoTc211Standards . 
Also links to a variety of resources. The OGC work references all of the ISO 
standards mentioned on this page.

Cheers

Carl

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan Brickley" <danbri at danbri.org>
To: "Joshua Lieberman" <josh at oklieb.net>
Cc: "GeoXG GeoXG" <public-xg-geo at w3.org>; <georss at lists.eogeo.org>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: [georss] GeoRSS meeting review


> Joshua Lieberman wrote:
>> Dan,
>>
>> Please give us some feedback on
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/Wiki/Geo_Update so that we can move
>> ahead with this RDF/OWL vocabulary, which matches GeoRSS. There are many
>> aspects of "how" to realize a vocabulary in these languages which are
>> not entirely straightforward to optimize, so input is really needed.
>
> I'll try to take a proper look. First question ... it mentions ISO 19109,
>
> "NeoGeo (proposed) consists of a root property _featureproperty which
> takes as its domain any OWL/RDF class that it makes sense (after ISO
> 19109) to cast as a geographic feature."
>
> Is ISO 19109 freely available? If not, could someone summarise? The W3C
> "basic geo" vocab defined a class "spatial thing", which seems to be in
> a similar role. But we didn't go into much detail about what we
> considered that to exactly amount to. Could the domain of
> "featureproperty" be basicgeo:SpatialThing, for example?
>
> I can't currently get to http://mapbureau.com/neogeo/neogeo.owl and the
> host doesn't seem to respond to pings.
>
> cheers,
>
> Dan
>
> Dan
> _______________________________________________
> georss mailing list
> georss at lists.eogeo.org
> http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss