[georss] Georss extension

Pat Cappelaere pat at cappelaere.com
Sat Sep 9 16:53:25 EDT 2006


Well, that's the question.
It does feel like georss, addresses some granularity issues and allow for
easier publish/subscribe.
Pat.


> From: "Kralidis,Tom [Burlington]" <Tom.Kralidis at ec.gc.ca>
> Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 16:07:35 -0400
> To: Pat Cappelaere <pat at cappelaere.com>, <georss at lists.eogeo.org>,
> "Josh at oklieb" <josh at oklieb.net>
> Conversation: [georss] Georss extension
> Subject: RE: [georss] Georss extension
> 
>  
>> Would this be acceptable to extend georss this way?
>>     <georss:where>
>>       <gml:Point>
>>         <gml:pos>-159.774,62.1664</gml:pos>
>>       </gml:Point>
>>     </georss:where>
>>     <georss:zone_number>1</georss:zone_number>
>>     <georss:zone_name>Central Alaska</georss:zone_name>
>>     <georss:region_number>1</georss:region_number>
>>     <georss:region_name>Alaska - Aleutian Arc</georss:region_name>
>> 
>> I need to extend the EO-1 Geobliki atom feeds so we can test
>> the SAS/pubsub mechanism and I need to stay away from spatial
>> operations for the moment...
> 
> Do we need to get GeoRSS involved at all here?  You can put these under
> another namespace.
> 
> ..Tom
> 





More information about the georss mailing list