[georss] which version?

Andrew Turner georss at highearthorbit.com
Sat May 6 11:29:34 EDT 2006


I think people have implemented Simple so far. That's what FoFRedux
supports, since it's the easiest to start with.

That's a good question about a single feed with mixed geo- and
non-geo, or separate feeds. I'm interested to hear what others think.

Andrew

> On 5/6/06, Douglass Davis <douglass_davis at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I have a few kind of related questions... if any one could help, i would
> > appreciate it...
> >
> >
> >
> > I was wondering, out of the W3C version and the GML version, which version
> > of georss is more popular at the present time with readers that can
> > understand georss?
> >
> > for most GeoRSS readers, do they understand both?  That is, if one version
> > is used, will it mean some readers will not understand it?
> >
> > And, on my site i will have a mix of some news articles that have geometry,
> > and some that don't, do you think it would be best to have 2 separate RSS
> > links?  A GeoRSS link, exclusively for items with geometry, and then an RSS
> > link for everything?
> > _______________________________________________
> > georss mailing list
> > georss at lists.eogeo.org
> > http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Turner
> ajturner at highearthorbit.com        42.4266N x 83.4931W
> http://highearthorbit.com              Northville, Michigan, USA
>


--
Andrew Turner
ajturner at highearthorbit.com        42.4266N x 83.4931W
http://highearthorbit.com              Northville, Michigan, USA



More information about the georss mailing list